EXAMINE THIS REPORT ON CASE LAW ON SECTION 395 PPC CONVICTIONS

Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Blog Article

refers to the landmark case decided with the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Listed here’s a brief overview:

Unfortunately, that was not legitimate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son told his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to owning sexually molested the pair’s son several times.

four.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of one day in the registration of FIR which has not been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of your alleged event as well as the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of your petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred to generally be the real brothers of your deceased but they did not react in the slightest degree on the confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on lots of events that extra judicial confession of the accused is often a weak form of evidence which could be manoeuvred through the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution can be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word concerning existence of some light for the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners alongside one another over a motorcycle at 4.

twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service ubi jus ibi remedium case law it is predicted that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced on the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )

In this website post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Discovering its provisions as well as gravity of its punishment.

 Petitioner owning been declared an absconder in this case for over just one as well as a half year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may avoid standing trial and as a result delay the prosecution with the case. The material on record makes the case on the petitioner falls under two exceptions for the rule of grant of bail as mentioned over.

The Court regarded the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (3) For the reason that Hazard and encroachment alleged were such as to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, including eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.

In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to your death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

90 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion would be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for turning out to be entitled being regarded as for promotion to a higher quality, of course, is just not without logic since the officer who's initially inducted to the particular post needs to serve within the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and also to serve the public in a befitting manner.

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are set up by executive organizations based on statutes.

Report this page